CTC Vs Take Home pay-------The war goes on
When the
answer is pre decided there can be many questions that can fit in to justify
the reply as right. The fixing of salary structure is similarly done in many
companies. The employee stands his ground to state what should be his take home
pay, the company equally firmly stands on its cost to company known as CTC. The
permutation and combination of various components of the pay structure is then
decided with the statutory compulsions of PF, ESI, Professional tax etc are
also been put up with.
The basic
pay is kept low in order to reduce the effect of payments that are calculated
as a percentage of basic. Special allowance, other allowance, house rent
allowance, transport, medical reimbursement are the bifurcations that decide
the take home. What is so ‘special’ and what is the ‘other’ factor of allowance
is something hardly clarified by any company.
Some companies also add bonus, gratuity etc that an employee gets only
on completion of specific period.
There is
many a slip between the cup and the lip. Many agreed recruitments do not come
thro in the battle of ‘take home’ Vs ‘CTC’. It is understandable in the case of
lower salary than IT limit or around that where people insist on higher take
home to meet ends easily. But the one paying tax and also high tax go on
negotiating take home pay even insisting that the pay demanded has to be after
deduction of income tax. Hence there
would be many rounds of discussion and changes made in the taxable and non
taxable components with vehicle and petrol as perks adding to the debate.
Many
companies add intangible and almost invisible components like performance
bonus, LTC, loyalty allowance etc that convert discussions into arguments and
most often snaps the pay deal. Potential employees view such components of pay
with suspicion rightly so, as the components inherently carry right of the
management for interpretation. If leave is not granted LTC goes waste
automatically. Claiming such components as integral part of pay pocket is
typically viewed as ‘unintended pay’
by many.
The rules of
income tax department do come in to picture to decide the pay structure in high
salary category. While labor laws are many, none specifically state or provided
for deciding the components of pay structure resulting in cases like additional
special allowance when one without the addition itself is unexplained. Unfortunately the HR profession has been
recognizing juggling with the pay structure as a KPA of an HR executive. Though
absence of control through legislation is the main reason, the heads of HR
Forum have a role to play to reverse the trend with proper representation to
the Government. After all human resources management is managing with knowledge
of psychology, wisdom and industry specific needs and not by interpretation of
loopholes.
The
government has to ensure this and HR has to be ethical enough to take the
initiative and support the government to bring about the changes. Until then
whatever win-win situation is created would be short sighted and short lived.
*************************************
Comments