PF LIMIT INCREASE TO RS.15000/- IS WINDFALL IN WAITING
A 22 year old boy had applied for
Provident Fund claim and I questioned him on the logic of it. He replied that
he wants his one year PF money to buy a smart phone as margin money. I was not
aghast as I have seen even engineers displaying similar tendency to repossess
the PF that according to them was forcibly deducted from their salary.
Most of the
employees in the non Income tax category have been finding their salary just
enough to make both ends meet also fulfilling partly their aspiration to
possess items of prestige. Hence job hopping in search of greener pastures is common among them and while hopping they
also mop up their PF. While it is
perfectly fine to hop I am against the mop.
PF is deducted
@12% of pay on a maximum of Rs.6500/- and under the concept of CTC (cost to
company) the employer is not keen to
insist on higher deduction of PF as employees detest any deduction that is not
statutorily warranted. Though PF is very much their money that grows with equal
contribution from the employer and also with half yearly interest that is not
low, the tendency is to have cash in hand and living in the present. The word
Provident has the meaning of wise/sagacious and also
farseeing/visionary/prophetic but they don’t serve the present and hence not
desired.
With this
backdrop the Government has now decided to increase the limit from Rs.6500/- to
Rs.15000/- This would result in a direct increase of Rs. 1020 in PF both for
employee and employer. If CTC is the basis of wage fixation the employee would
have Rs.2040/- reduced in take home though this would add up to his PF. Obviously
employees in general and those in lower brackets in particular would vehemently
oppose this forcing the employer to have a review of the CTC.
By this move the
only immediate beneficiary would be the Government which would if all
industries remit the additional amount of PF, benefit by a huge chunk of money
to augment their resources. Having this PF money in their hand would please
employees who would love to spend it on luxuries and comforts treating them as
necessities.
Luxury converted
to necessity is lavishness be it a smart phone or
a high end bike or any other gadgets that have more magnificence than utility.
Though youth is an age of enjoyment, old age is per force a choice less tenure and one is not sure of
what is in store in health, luxury and comfort though responsibilities of self,
spouse and children is a guaranteed assignment. Hence it is more important to
be prudent with Provident Fund that impulsive with youthful exuberance. It is
the responsibility of the State to impress this with their regulations. Corporates
today talk of social responsibility as it fetches marketing mileage, but their responsibility
towards their own employees is a larger duty. Hence apart from educating
employees on the impending amendment to PF rules they also have to think of
reviewing pay structure, if required by adjusting the CTC component of
employees in the lower bracket of salary.
Peace, harmony
and serenity become inevitable necessities of life after 50 years of age, and
financial independence is the source of stability of one’s mind. Support from relatives and
children would be welcome comforts if not luxuries. The PF which if
supplemented with Voluntary PF and Public Provident fund would make a perfect
corpus for ensuring a life of choice at old age.
Hence the
proposed amendment to the PF provision is a windfall in waiting and not a
hanging sword.
**********************************
Comments