"Make in India" is a welcome slogan provided..........
“You have to pay a deposit of Rs.
1000/- and sign a fidelity guarantee Insurance for joining the bank as a
cashier” was a condition to join the nationalized bank as a cashier. The amount
of Rs.1000/- was fixed when the salary of clerks was around Rs.350/- p.m. The
amount continued to remain the same though the salary was increased manifold.
Similarly there is also financial reward of Rs. 5000/- which was fixed by the
government when the salary was less than thousand and continued to remain
so.
As a Management Consultant while I
could suggest changes in such archaic rules, the Law that still continues
beyond my control baffles me. Professional Tax ( only in some states), Labor
welfare fund (Rs.7/- per year per employee even today in Tamil Nadu and Rs.3/-
for six months or so in some other state) the Shops and Establishment Act that
comes for implementation in bits and pieces by whims and fancies of some
officials and many more.
All these acts and rules prescribe
maintenance of salary details in different formats in registers whereby a
company has to keep the same data in different formats for different government
agencies that may come for inspection again at their whims and fancies. In one
state a company was threatened with action for not displaying the benefits of
maternity in the notice board when there were no women employees!!! The fonts
were too small and the sheet three times the size of a normal notice board, yet
insistence on exhibiting the benefits.
For a small business coming under
SME category there are too many bosses in the form of implementation
authorities/inspectors for too small a turnover and too many returns to various
authorities including nil returns. While the government at the centre claimed
that they are clearing some obsolete laws, it is also time to standardize
returns/statements may be separately for financial and labor law enforcing
authorities. Data in whatever format needed can be asked to be
uploaded in a specified website and a certification on the correctness issued
or inspection can be held on an appointed date for clarifications.
In case of labor laws there can also
be a "Representation Counter" for employees in the website thro which
employee objections can be handled for a more peaceful co existence. In
the process the onus of compliance would remain with the companies concerned
but the compliance support system of the government would also be forced to be
activated. In other words it is not compliance monitoring but compliance
support whereby failure of compliance is not the sole failure of the company
concerned but of the system.
Ignorance of law is not an excuse
for the companies and awareness of the rules is an obligation for the
enforcement authorities to ensure that the ignorance does not result in
violation liable for penal action. "Challenge the status quo" is the
oft repeated phrase in discussion of Leadership models. Right from the example
of Rs.1000/- for cash deposit for a cashier up to labor welfare fund of seven
rupees per annum people have chosen to sleep with the status quo. Even the fact
that the cost of collection/accounting and system monitoring is costlier than
the amount earned has not disturbed their inaction.
Laws have to be dynamic so also
rules. Technology is incapable of being static. Therefore it is the technology
that has to support implementation of rules and laws for the betterment of the
society. A classic and already existing example is the number of crimes solved
thro cc television footage. Technology is the base, but human applying it
fruitfully is the cause of success. What is applicable to crime is equally
applicable to industry. "Make in India" is a welcome slogan
provided we make it easy for the industry to make in India easily.
Let us hopefully wait for the Acche
Din.
**************************************
Comments