JUSTICE VS FAVOR -- THE LEADERSHIP BATTLE IS ALWAYS ON
Leadership
always has a battle on hand. Whether to offer justice or favor? Favor fetches
loyalties and huge favor in terms of money, power and patronage to further the
threesome brings in loyalists. Loyalty is more of an isolated faithfulness that
vanishes with time as well as denial of further favors. But loyalists having
tasted the benefit of loyalty to power choose to support the leadership
irrespective of their corrupt, criminal and even immoral acts and also turn as
spokesperson to defend or deny the wrongs as they are elements of the
beneficiary as well as conduit to the wrong.
Justice is
widely liked and easily forgotten as people believe they deserve it. Justice is
also not realized as justice till acts of injustice start as part of the system.
Leaders indulge in justice for overall good image, support of good Samaritans
and also inevitably. Justice when met out as punishment especially through
imprisonment or death also has huge emotional facet that leaders prefer to
handle with safety glove or silence as
opposing by going with the emotion would tarnish their ability of good sense.
A shrewd
leader mixes justice and favor deftly. He does favors as justice where
discretion rescues him out of the favor charge though there are others vying
for the benefit. But leadership perennially has weakness for loyalists since
any leadership is always under challenge with someone else vying to capture it.
The leader feels secure with a known set of loyalists hence they tend to
overstep in justice by favoring them who ultimately help in their personal
effectual leadership.
Yet a leader
needs to spread justice without the support of loyalists. While loyalists rebel in such instances the leadership has to
implant the message that discretion management is not exclusive domain of a few
individuals. Discretion throws up many possibilities for decision making. When
a favor is made, the majority need to see one explanation that is convincing to
see it as "not injustice". The role of leadership would be incomplete
without favors though justice has to be the ultimate goal. How much of favors
can be inbuilt to use the system as a vehicle of justice is a decision the
leader has to take.
In that
process successful leaders use loyalists to reach the ultimate goal of justice by
assigning them the arduous job of auditing the real meting out of justice. Having
been beneficiaries of many favors they do perform this job albeit with grudge. In
a society persons who have multifarious abilities are inevitable and seek to
grab more than their share of rewards. Curbing such tendencies without losing
their support by extending temporary and invisible favors is a sure and
successful way of rendering overall justice to the society and many successful
leaders practice it.
***************************************************************
Comments